Home Multi-Country Search About Admin Login
Cenozoic
Mesozoic
Paleozoic
Neoproterozoic
Mesoproterozoic
Paleoproterozoic

Search by
Select Region(s) to search
Hold Ctrl (Windows/Linux) or Command (Mac) to select multiple
Pariwar Formation
Click to display on map of the Ancient World at:
Pariwar Fm base reconstruction

Pariwar Fm


Period: 
Cretaceous

Age Interval: 
Berriasian-Valanginian


Province: 
NW.India Rajastan-Jaisalmer Basin

Type Locality and Naming

OUTCROP and SUBSURFACE. Scarp section East of Habur village. [Original Publication: Swaminath, J., Krishnamurthy, J.G., Verma, K.K., and Chandak, G.J., 1959, General geology of Jaisalmer area, Rajasthan, ECAFE Symposium, Mineral Research and Development Series 10: 154-155]. Reference well: Outcrops near Kuchri and Kali Dungri areas. Well Bhuana-1, interval 400-603m.

Synonyms: Oldham (1886) first described the formation as “Parihar beds”, which included the entire arenaceous sequence from Lower Cretaceous to Paleocene. Later on Swaminathan et al (1959) dropped the word “beds” and designated the sequence as Pariwar Formation. Dasgupta (1975) suggested informally two subdivisions in this formation Lower and Upper. The name was adopted by Narayan et al (1961) who equated it with Umia beds of Kutch. Willm (1964) spelled it as “Pariwar Formation”.


Lithology and Thickness

Siltstone. The lower part is represented by yellow to brown interbedded sandy siltstone and calcareous sandstone. The middle part consists of yellow sandy clay with embedded large fossil tree trunks. The upper part comprises of pebbly sandstone and siltstone with fossil wood at its base. Dasgupta (1975) has measured about 350 m thickness of the formation on surface. In subsurface maximum thickness of the order of 850 m is recorded in the well Lang-2.

[Figure 1: Location map of West Rajasthan Basins (after Pandey and Dave, 1998)]

[Figure 2: Stratotype of Pariwar Formation, Mesozoic Lithostratigraphy of the Jaisalmer Basin, Rajasthan, Journal of the Paleontological Society of India, Vol. 51(2) (after Singh N.P, 2006)]

[Figure 3: Generalized and Subsurface Stratigraphy of Jaisalmer Basin (from dghindia.gov.in)]


Lithology Pattern: 
Siltstone


Relationships and Distribution

Lower contact

In the outcrops the lower boundary has disconformable contact with the underlying Bhadasar Fm (ca. Tithonian), but in the subsurface the contact is conformable.

Upper contact

The upper boundary in the outcrops is unconformable with overlying Habur Fm and in subsurface it has conformable relationship with the overlying Goru Fm.

Regional extent

[Figure 4: Stratigraphic Correlation of Rajasthan Basins (from dghindia.gov.in)]


GeoJSON

{"type":"Feature","geometry":{"type":"MultiPolygon","coordinates":[[[[70.32,27.14],[71.87,27.6],[71.63,27.42],[71.98,27.15],[71.63,26.44],[71.01,26.32],[70.7,26.52],[70.32,27.14]]]]}}

Fossils

Epistomina cf. E. tenuicosta, Ammobaulites cf. minimus, Lenticulina cf. petecensis have been reported by Sigal and Singh (1980).


Age 

Shown as spanning only Berriasian-Valanginian on Dr. Raju's summary chart

Age Span: 

    Beginning stage: 
Berriasian

    Fraction up in beginning stage: 
0.0

    Beginning date (Ma): 
143.10

    Ending stage: 
Hauterivian

    Fraction up in the ending stage: 
0.1

    Ending date (Ma):  
131.99

Depositional setting

Continental with intermittent, shallow inner neritic


Depositional pattern:  


Additional Information


Compiler:  

D.S.N Raju